reverted changes from e7b11bfa: "added s_changed signal of properties also...

reverted changes from e7b11bfa: "added s_changed signal of properties also being propagated to its shared properties"
This was weak design and lead to problems with the AutoEvaluationPipeline.

core/properties/abstractproperty.cpp

@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ namespace campvis {
     }
 
     AbstractProperty::~AbstractProperty() {
+
     }
 
     const std::string& AbstractProperty::getName() {
@@ -63,11 +64,11 @@ namespace campvis {
 
     void AbstractProperty::addSharedProperty(AbstractProperty* prop) {
         tgtAssert(prop != 0, "Shared property must not be 0!");
+        tgtAssert(prop != this, "Shared property must not be this!");
         tgtAssert(typeid(this) == typeid(prop), "Shared property must be of the same type as this property.");
 
         tbb::spin_mutex::scoped_lock lock(_localMutex);
         _sharedProperties.insert(prop);
-        s_changed.connect(this, &AbstractProperty::onChanged);
     }
 
     void AbstractProperty::removeSharedProperty(AbstractProperty* prop) {
@@ -105,11 +106,4 @@ namespace campvis {
         s_visibilityChanged(this);
     }
 
-    void AbstractProperty::onChanged(const AbstractProperty* prop) {
-        //tbb::spin_mutex::scoped_lock lock(_localMutex);
-        for (std::set<AbstractProperty*>::iterator it = _sharedProperties.begin(); it != _sharedProperties.end(); ++it) {
-            (*it)->s_changed(prop);
-        }
-    }
-
 }

core/properties/abstractproperty.h

@@ -154,8 +154,6 @@ namespace campvis {
         sigslot::signal1<const AbstractProperty*> s_visibilityChanged;
 
     protected:
-
-        void onChanged(const AbstractProperty* prop);
         
         // DO NOT REMOVE THE CONSTNESS OF _name. PropertyCollection relies on it!
         const std::string _name;                ///< Property name (unchangable on purpose!)