minor fixes

02a_Demonstrators-Workflow.tex

@@ -23,13 +23,14 @@ the \exahype\ engine is actually built. You can always check / reconstruct these
 The high-level overview of the \exahype\ workflow has been visualised in Figure \ref{fig:workflow}.
 
 \afterpage{\clearpage}
-\begin{sidewaysfigure}
+%\begin{landscape}
+\begin{figure}
 \centering
 \includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{tikz/demonstrators-workflow.pdf}
 \includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{tikz/demonstrators-legend.pdf}
 \caption[Sketch (tikz): High-level overview of \exahype\ workflow]{High-level overview of \exahype\ workflow and files generated by the application. \label{fig:workflow}}
-\end{sidewaysfigure}
-
+\end{figure}
+%\end{landscape}
 \newpage
 \subsection{Configuration file}
 

guidebook.tex

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ agreement No 671698.
 \noindent
 This particular document was generated on \today\ at \currenttime. \\
 
-\noindent Copyright \copyright\ 2018 The \exahype\ consortium
+\noindent Copyright \copyright\ 2019 The \exahype\ consortium
 (see page \pageref{sec:list-of-authors} for a detailled list of authors)
 \\
 
@@ -132,23 +132,23 @@ This particular document was generated on \today\ at \currenttime. \\
 
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-  \part{\exahype\ installation and demonstrator applications}
+  \part{\exahype\ installation and Demonstrators}
   \input{01_download}
-
-  \input{02_demonstrators}
-  \pagebreak
-  \input{02a_Demonstrators-Workflow}
-  \input{02b_Euler-FiniteVolumes}
   \input{03_documentation}
   %removed for now since this structure is no longer correct
   %\input{04_development-process}
-
+    \input{02_demonstrators}
+    \input{02a_Demonstrators-Workflow}
+  \input{02b_Euler-FiniteVolumes}
+  
   \part{Developing new \exahype\ applications}
   \input{10_setup-experiment} 
   \input{11_aderdg-user-fluxes.tex}
   \input{11_swe.tex}
   \input{12_coupling-limiter.tex}
   \input{13_adaptive-mesh-refinement.tex}
+  
+  \part{Advanced Features}
   \input{14_advanced.tex}
   \input{15_fortran.tex}
   \input{16_complicated-domains.tex}

x0_lists.tex

@@ -21,42 +21,45 @@
 \item Tobias Weinzierl (Durham University)
 \item Vasco Varduhn (TUM, Munich)
 \item Anne Reinarz (TUM, Munich)
+\item Olga Glogowska (TUM, Munich)
 \end{itemize}
 
-\subsection{Detailed contributions}
-
-The editing on the guidebook is managed within the version control software \texttt{git}.
-That makes it in principle easy to track individual changes and to quantify the amount
-each author contributed. However, be \emph{warned} that there is not a unique way of
-measuring authorship. We tested two methods which results are given in table
-\ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1} and \ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}, respectively. The most
-useful number is probably the total number of lines changed (\texttt{loc}). This does
-not tell anything about the originality, quality or information density of these edits.
-The number of commits (\texttt{coms}) is an estimate how frequently edits were
-made.
-The number of changed files (\texttt{fils}) is a first attemp to measure the number of
-added figures, especially in method II. Method I contains a neat overview about when
-respective authors made their first and last commit -- note that several authors joined
-the project later while others left it already, this reflects also in these numbers.
-
-\begin{table}
-\makebox[\textwidth][c]{ % centering overwidth table
-\begin{small}
-% Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
-\input{stats/stats-gitquick.tex}
-\end{small}
-} % end of center overwidth table
-\caption{Authors contributions measured with method I.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1}
-\end{table}
-
-\begin{table}
-\begin{small}
-% Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
-% http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbfile.html
-\verbatiminput{stats/stats-gitfame.txt}
-\end{small}
-\caption{Authors contributions measured with method II.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}
-\end{table}
+
+%Hopelessly out of date
+% \subsection{Detailed contributions}
+% 
+% The editing on the guidebook is managed within the version control software \texttt{git}.
+% That makes it in principle easy to track individual changes and to quantify the amount
+% each author contributed. However, be \emph{warned} that there is not a unique way of
+% measuring authorship. We tested two methods which results are given in table
+% \ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1} and \ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}, respectively. The most
+% useful number is probably the total number of lines changed (\texttt{loc}). This does
+% not tell anything about the originality, quality or information density of these edits.
+% The number of commits (\texttt{coms}) is an estimate how frequently edits were
+% made.
+% The number of changed files (\texttt{fils}) is a first attemp to measure the number of
+% added figures, especially in method II. Method I contains a neat overview about when
+% respective authors made their first and last commit -- note that several authors joined
+% the project later while others left it already, this reflects also in these numbers.
+% 
+% \begin{table}
+% \makebox[\textwidth][c]{ % centering overwidth table
+% \begin{small}
+% % Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
+% \input{stats/stats-gitquick.tex}
+% \end{small}
+% } % end of center overwidth table
+% \caption{Authors contributions measured with method I.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1}
+% \end{table}
+% 
+% \begin{table}
+% \begin{small}
+% % Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
+% % http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbfile.html
+% \verbatiminput{stats/stats-gitfame.txt}
+% \end{small}
+% \caption{Authors contributions measured with method II.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}
+% \end{table}
 
 \clearpage