Commit ca40cc27 authored by Anne Reinarz's avatar Anne Reinarz
Browse files

minor fixes

parent 06ebf1ab
......@@ -23,13 +23,14 @@ the \exahype\ engine is actually built. You can always check / reconstruct these
The high-level overview of the \exahype\ workflow has been visualised in Figure \ref{fig:workflow}.
\afterpage{\clearpage}
\begin{sidewaysfigure}
%\begin{landscape}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{tikz/demonstrators-workflow.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{tikz/demonstrators-legend.pdf}
\caption[Sketch (tikz): High-level overview of \exahype\ workflow]{High-level overview of \exahype\ workflow and files generated by the application. \label{fig:workflow}}
\end{sidewaysfigure}
\end{figure}
%\end{landscape}
\newpage
\subsection{Configuration file}
......
......@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ agreement No 671698.
\noindent
This particular document was generated on \today\ at \currenttime. \\
\noindent Copyright \copyright\ 2018 The \exahype\ consortium
\noindent Copyright \copyright\ 2019 The \exahype\ consortium
(see page \pageref{sec:list-of-authors} for a detailled list of authors)
\\
......@@ -132,16 +132,14 @@ This particular document was generated on \today\ at \currenttime. \\
%----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\part{\exahype\ installation and demonstrator applications}
\part{\exahype\ installation and Demonstrators}
\input{01_download}
\input{02_demonstrators}
\pagebreak
\input{02a_Demonstrators-Workflow}
\input{02b_Euler-FiniteVolumes}
\input{03_documentation}
%removed for now since this structure is no longer correct
%\input{04_development-process}
\input{02_demonstrators}
\input{02a_Demonstrators-Workflow}
\input{02b_Euler-FiniteVolumes}
\part{Developing new \exahype\ applications}
\input{10_setup-experiment}
......@@ -149,6 +147,8 @@ This particular document was generated on \today\ at \currenttime. \\
\input{11_swe.tex}
\input{12_coupling-limiter.tex}
\input{13_adaptive-mesh-refinement.tex}
\part{Advanced Features}
\input{14_advanced.tex}
\input{15_fortran.tex}
\input{16_complicated-domains.tex}
......
......@@ -21,42 +21,45 @@
\item Tobias Weinzierl (Durham University)
\item Vasco Varduhn (TUM, Munich)
\item Anne Reinarz (TUM, Munich)
\item Olga Glogowska (TUM, Munich)
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Detailed contributions}
The editing on the guidebook is managed within the version control software \texttt{git}.
That makes it in principle easy to track individual changes and to quantify the amount
each author contributed. However, be \emph{warned} that there is not a unique way of
measuring authorship. We tested two methods which results are given in table
\ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1} and \ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}, respectively. The most
useful number is probably the total number of lines changed (\texttt{loc}). This does
not tell anything about the originality, quality or information density of these edits.
The number of commits (\texttt{coms}) is an estimate how frequently edits were
made.
The number of changed files (\texttt{fils}) is a first attemp to measure the number of
added figures, especially in method II. Method I contains a neat overview about when
respective authors made their first and last commit -- note that several authors joined
the project later while others left it already, this reflects also in these numbers.
\begin{table}
\makebox[\textwidth][c]{ % centering overwidth table
\begin{small}
% Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
\input{stats/stats-gitquick.tex}
\end{small}
} % end of center overwidth table
\caption{Authors contributions measured with method I.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1}
\end{table}
\begin{table}
\begin{small}
% Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
% http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbfile.html
\verbatiminput{stats/stats-gitfame.txt}
\end{small}
\caption{Authors contributions measured with method II.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}
\end{table}
%Hopelessly out of date
% \subsection{Detailed contributions}
%
% The editing on the guidebook is managed within the version control software \texttt{git}.
% That makes it in principle easy to track individual changes and to quantify the amount
% each author contributed. However, be \emph{warned} that there is not a unique way of
% measuring authorship. We tested two methods which results are given in table
% \ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1} and \ref{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}, respectively. The most
% useful number is probably the total number of lines changed (\texttt{loc}). This does
% not tell anything about the originality, quality or information density of these edits.
% The number of commits (\texttt{coms}) is an estimate how frequently edits were
% made.
% The number of changed files (\texttt{fils}) is a first attemp to measure the number of
% added figures, especially in method II. Method I contains a neat overview about when
% respective authors made their first and last commit -- note that several authors joined
% the project later while others left it already, this reflects also in these numbers.
%
% \begin{table}
% \makebox[\textwidth][c]{ % centering overwidth table
% \begin{small}
% % Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
% \input{stats/stats-gitquick.tex}
% \end{small}
% } % end of center overwidth table
% \caption{Authors contributions measured with method I.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod1}
% \end{table}
%
% \begin{table}
% \begin{small}
% % Regenerate this file with the scripts in the directory stats/
% % http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbfile.html
% \verbatiminput{stats/stats-gitfame.txt}
% \end{small}
% \caption{Authors contributions measured with method II.}\label{tbl:xAuthorsMethod2}
% \end{table}
\clearpage
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment