Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
  • ExaHyPE-Engine ExaHyPE-Engine
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
    • Locked files
  • Issues 68
    • Issues 68
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
    • Requirements
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • ExaHyPEExaHyPE
  • ExaHyPE-EngineExaHyPE-Engine
  • Issues
  • #179
Closed
Open
Issue created Sep 24, 2017 by Ghost User@ghostContributor

Split TimeStepSizeComputation and merge parts with SolutionUpdate and LocalRecomputation

  • TimeStepSizeComputation will be reduced to a simple time step size computation function. SolutionUpdate and LocalRecomputation will also compute a time step size and will further advance in time. This will reduce logic.

  • Next step will be a fusion of multiple algorithmic phases of the ADER-DG and Limiting ADER-DG schemes in a single solver function. This will hopefully make it easier to optimise for the compiler and easier for the processor cache to decide what to hold or drop.

  • We might be able to get rid of mapping FusedTimeSteppingInitialisation with the above split.

Edited Sep 26, 2017 by Ghost User
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking

LRZ Homepage | Datenschutz | Dokumentation und Betriebsbedingungen | Impressum