Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
  • ExaHyPE-Engine ExaHyPE-Engine
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 68
    • Issues 68
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
    • Requirements
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test Cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

9.2.2023: Due to updates GitLab will be unavailable for some minutes between 9:00 and 11:00.

  • ExaHyPEExaHyPE
  • ExaHyPE-EngineExaHyPE-Engine
  • Issues
  • #247
Closed
Open
Issue created Sep 01, 2018 by Sven Köppel@svenk2Owner

Toolkit2: Make subprocess invocation of ExaHyPE main code optional

Some people might not like the idea that the ExaHyPE code calls the Toolkit in order to (pre)parse specification files.

We should offer a specfile option within the specfiles to allow to generate code which does not calls a subprocess but instead expects the input to be JSON.

This could be seen as advance hotfix when people report problems in complex MPI environments.

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking

LRZ Homepage | Datenschutz | Dokumentation und Betriebsbedingungen | Impressum